Home Current News News Archive Shop/Advertise Ridecamp Classified Events Learn/AERC
Endurance.Net Home Ridecamp Archives
ridecamp@endurance.net
[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]

Re: [RC] beet pulp - Elizabeth Walker

If you like, I can do an experiment.  :)  I have both shreds and some old pellets on hand.  

I know that when I was using the pellets, I had to shift from using a coffee can to using a 1/3 cup scoop.  :)

 I have a food scale that I use to weigh out all my concentrates.  I weighed my dry shreds - took up about a coffee can or so.  Then I measured the same weight in pellets - took about 1/3 cup.  When I finished soaking, I had as much as I normally did with the shreds.  Still, it was a while ago, so I can re-run the experiment if anybody is interested..



On Jan 31, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Terry Banister wrote:

Hey, I don't use pellets. This is just what people tell me. But the pound of pellets takes up less space, they say, so you can store more pounds iper container, and because they are denser, they expand larger than the pound of shreds when put in water. 
Pellet users - Is this correct?

Terry
"May the Horse be with You"



 

From: sherman@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RC] beet pulp
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 16:05:06 -0800

This reminds me of the joke, which weighs more, a pound of rocks or a pound of feathers. A pound is a pound, right? How can a pound of pellets end up yielding more than a pound of shreds?  Add a half-gallon of water to each, soak overnight and you still have a pound of beet pulp and a half-gallon of water.
 
Kathy
 
 


Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft. Get it now.


Replies
[RC] beet pulp, sherman
RE: [RC] beet pulp, Terry Banister