Check it Out!
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index] [Subject Index]

RE: RC: RE: Fwd: physiology of weight

Wonderful points, Truman.  But!  If weight were the only factor of
importance, then ONLY FW/LW riders would ever top ten.  If the physics
around carried weight are valid, then there is no way to compensate for it -
it must be in effect for every rider and horse on every ride.

My point - there must be some other aspects of the horse/rider equation that
allow MW/HW riders to win and top ten events.  I would love to find out what
those are.

Mike Sofen

-----Original Message-----
From: Truman Prevatt []

Mike you have just answered your own question. Work required is directly
proportional to mass - that's high school physics. It takes twice the work
carry a 220 pound rider than it does a 110 pound ride. Since the conversion
chemical energy to mechanical energy (which is how the body works) is not
efficient, maybe 50%, the other portion of the energy is converted to heat.
heat has to be dissipated. So a horse carrying a 220 pound rider has to
dissipate twice the heat as a horse carrying a 110 pound ride. Here is where
Howard may have had a good point but didn't know it :-), in the humidity it
harder to dissipate heat than in arid and semi-arid climates. So the heat
dissipation related to weight differences may in fact be slightly bigger
in the East than the West, but I doubt it.

The more heat required to be dissipated the more sweat, the more
lost, the higher the stress on the metabolic system. So I would say from a
string of conclusions using no more than high school physics, there is a
significantly higher stress level on a horse carrying 220 pounds vs 110

On question, how do you compensate for the "mitigating factor" of a horse
carrying a heavier weight producing more heat in proportion of the weight


    Check it Out!    

Home    Events    Groups    Rider Directory    Market    RideCamp    Stuff

Back to TOC