<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Mustangs
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:42:00 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] wild horses
  • - Heidi Smith
  • Prev by Date: [RC] Goethe
  • - CatThom2

    Re: [RC] Mustangs - Heidi Smith


    >I still don't understand how we can gather herds, test for EIA and WNV, file feet, vaccinate and worm, but you say that birth control hasn't worked? Why the heck not?? If we can hold them to draw blood and give a shot, it would be just as easy to do a quick slice.  OUCH! Why would any one waste money on the "patch" for the mares? I don't get that one.
     
    Uh, the majority don't get gathered and tested, let alone filed, vaccinated, or dewormed.  When there is an outbreak of something like EIA, then groups may have to be caught and tested--I was in on one of these situations when the horses on the Warm Springs Reservation were tested for EIA back in the 80's--all 8000 or so head.  It was a massive undertaking, and the cost to do that alone to all of the feral horses in the West would be astronomical.  It was a rotten, dangerous job.  For the most part, these horses live out there like deer or elk, with little intervention.  And because they are so reproductively efficient, therein lies the problem.  As for birth control--it is more important to do the mares than the stallions, since one stallion can impregnate several mares, but the number of stallions is of little consequence if the mares can't conceive.  Spaying is out of the question on such a scale.  Progesterone implants are expensive and short lived.  Never mind the cost and problems associated with implanting them.
     
    >This thread may not seem endurance related, but if there are as many horses as the numbers that have been written, it could leave a bad taste in the mouths of those who feed our hunger for trails and wide open spaces. No? Yes. I don't know what the answer is but after the holidays, just to quench my thirst for knowledge, I will delve deeper and get some answers. Some one sent me some sites, so "thanks" to them.
     
    Yes, the numbers of wild horses could impact our access to public lands in some cases.
     
    J. Brashier--thanks again for another thoughtful and well-written post on this subject.  It is refreshing to find someone who professes to love Mustangs and who is honest about the hard facts of life concerning them.  As a veterinarian, I am pretty fond of horses in general, and am appalled that the "legislation by emotion" has put so many horses at risk for slow death by starvation or dehydration, never mind the damage to habitat.  There is a certain romance of having some wild horses dashing off into the sunset, but without control, the reality becomes hideous and inhumane.
     
    Lisa, another source you might want to delve into is a book called THE WILD HORSE CONTROVERSY, by Heather Thomas.  It is out of print, but available in many libraries.  (Might even find it on Amazon--I haven't looked.)  It is well researched (although not current--the situation is far worse now than when the book was written) and pretty well "tells it like it is."
     
    Heidi

    Replies
    [RC] Mustangs, oddfarm