Why do so many have a
problem with pull codes. If you get the wrong pull code it is tragic, but
not a reason not to use pull codes.
If you pull your horse
because you think it is, or is going, lame its an lamness
thing,
If you pull your horse
because you think it has, or is going to have, metabolic issues its a metabolic
thing.
If you don't like the ride,
have a bad day, have a fall, don't like the groud crew, don't like the heat,
don't like the cold, etc its a RO without futher adue.
As for a comment about the
levels of soundess on a vet card, and a horse completing which is off, I would
like to add the following;
The levels of valuation on
the vet card are designed to provide a history of the horse during a ride, from
check to check. Many rides have holds staffed by different vets, the vets
need to be able to compare the condition of the horse at this check to the
condition of the horse previous to this. If a problem is new and not seen
before, it may need to be looked at closer. If a problem is ongoing and
being handled by the horse and rider, maybe it is ok for now. This is a
history tool for the vet.
Some time volunteer to
write for a vet, then get a chance to stand there at the finish line and look at
a horse that is questionably sound. Then look at the rider that just
completed the ride. Then go over and tell them noooo! you didn't make
it. If you think there is a stigma attached to having your horse
pulled. Try the stigma attached to telling you your horse is
pulled.
As for the collection of
statistics;
My profession and expertise
is that of a 25 year computer systems consultant and software developer. I
can assure you that you can never go wrong by collecting data. The worst
you have done is waste a little paper. I am forever faced with questions
regarding the ability to analize data that does not exist. Look at
history, we always begin to track data after we have an event. When the
AIDS hit hard, the only blood bank in Canada that had proper transfusion history
was the one in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Not by my hand, but I did write the
system. This was Circa 1980, and I questioned keeping all this history,
but it was worth it.
Look at any club you belong
to, try to go back in the records if they exist and see what is there. Our
pull codes may not be perfect, but lets work to make it
better.
There is nothing wrong with
ROL and ROM, there is also a place for RO. But riders should not mask a
problem by RO. I agree there is an issue where the rider pulls a horse
that is passed a vet check, but we have a bigger issue with riders that pull
prior to the vets and call it RO because they know it won't
pass.
Roy
Drinnan
- Replies
-
- Re: [RC] PULL CODES, Dbeverly4