<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] [RC] Very young riders in AERC rides
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:37:41 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] Sewing a Sheath Shut?
  • - Laurie Durgin
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] Heart rate at CTR
  • - Laurie Durgin

    Re: [RC] [RC] Very young riders in AERC rides - Mike & Kathy Kelly


    But this is really an ethical issue, more so than a medical one.  A 5 yo
    isn't old enough to make his/her own fully informed/aware decisions (in
    other words, a 5yo isn't fully responsible for him/herself).  So others
    (usually the parents) make decisions for them.  The 5 yo can't understand
    the potential dangers involved with endurance rides and therefore can't
    consent to accept those risks.
    
    If parents decided to take their 5yo children on 100 mile rides just as
    family outings, most likely no one complains as long as all goes well.
    
    But when other groups or individuals become involved, they also get involved
    in the responsibility issue.
    
    An organization such as AERC assumes certain responsibilities for the rides
    it sponsors.  Rules are the way that AERC balances the responsibility it
    assumes with the risk involved with taking on such responsibilities.
    
    Kathy Kelly
    
    
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Nancy Mitts" <mitts_n@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: <ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 7:35 PM
    Subject: Re: [RC] [RC] Very young riders in AERC rides
    
    
    > >Lets look at it from a rational and theoretical point of view.
    > >   Karen Sullivan  West region
    >
    > Well, from a "rational & theoretical" point of view we wouldn't let anyone
    > do it! Something about being rational & riding 100 miles just doesn't
    > compute. <BG> (Just finished my 17th last weekend, so I know what
    irrational
    > is.)
    > On a more serious note, accidental injuries are no more (or less) horrible
    > at age 5, than 10, or 15 or 50. Lets hear some medical facts from medical
    > professionals about the dangers particular to a growing young child.
    That's
    > the criteria we need to go by. If damage to growing bodies is the issue,
    > couldn't it be a factor thru the teen years as well?
    >
    > Nancy Mitts
    >
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access!
    > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp
    >
    >
    > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    >  Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
    >  Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    >  Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    >
    >  If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws
    >  Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)
    >
    > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    
     If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws 
     Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    Re: [RC] [RC] Very young riders in AERC rides, Nancy Mitts