Re: [RC] Proposed by-laws-family voting vs. memberships - Lynne Glazer
At 9:47 AM -0700 10/8/02, sandy.l.holder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
"I don't think either the elimination of family memberships or the
elimination of voting rights for residents of this country who are
not citizens are in the best interests of our organization, nor are
they in the spirit of our organization. If I have to vote for or
against the entire package, this change will force me to vote no.
Well said Heidi, and yes, it's a shame that all the hard work that
went into the proposed by-laws (some really good changes) will not
go through because of the membership changes. . . unless I hear
otherwise (that we can vote section by section), I have to agree
with you and will be voting "no" as well. . .
I think there are two different things, as I recall a post by Mike
Maul some months back. As I recall, the bylaws refer to voting only,
and don't have anything to do with how we price our memberships--and
the latter will still include family memberships.
So, awaiting clarification, let's not run up the message count with me-too's?
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws
Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)
- [RC] Proposed by-laws, sandy . l . holder