Re: [RC] [RC] non-member fees (was Director at Large) - FASTGraphic
In a message dated 10/2/2002 1:16:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time, jlong@xxxxxxxx
writes:
<< If the per-rider fee isn't enough, then increase it to what is enough
and make it the same, fair amount for everyone.
No matter how you slice it and dice it non-member fees are a way to
bring more money in so that members don't have to pay as much. It is
making somebody else pay for your fun. I know people don't like to
admit that, but it's the pain, unvarnished truth. >>
Yes, the plain unvarnished truth is that "membership has its privileges."
I don't understand why this is so bad??? Fair amount for everyone? Why?
Why should members not get a break and non-members pay more? I am obviously
missing something, being new and realizing this is obviously an old argument.
But I just don't see what is wrong with charging non-members more to
encourage membership and give a break to the members.
Scott
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws
Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
|
|
