<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] the way we win/redefining endurance
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:35:57 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] the way we win/redefining endurance
  • - Heidi Smith
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] Juniors
  • - Merryben

    Re: [RC] the way we win/redefining endurance - Maggie & David


    > Why not just have CTR rides, with a UMECRA type scoring system?  No racing
    > to win.  No horsemanship judging. No artificial trail obstacles. A safe
    and
    > sane 5-7 mph pace, based on conditions. etc.
    
    
    It is being done in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana. Our sanctioned CTR's are
    not UMECRA, ECTRA, or NATRC. Our rules run the ride a bit faster than Natrc,
    without artificial obstacles (our trails have enough natural ones!), no
    horsemanship judging. We have a great time and we like the way our rules
    have evolved.
    
    It's a great sport, but it isn't endurance. It's just better than NATRC, for
    us anyway.
    
    Maggie Pritchard
    If you are interested go to www.ahaodistance.org
    
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    
     If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws 
     Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    Re: [RC] the way we win/redefining endurance, A. Perez
    Re: [RC] the way we win/redefining endurance, Ed and Wendy Hauser