Re: [RC] the way we win/redefining endurance - Maggie & David
> Why not just have CTR rides, with a UMECRA type scoring system? No racing
> to win. No horsemanship judging. No artificial trail obstacles. A safe
> sane 5-7 mph pace, based on conditions. etc.
It is being done in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana. Our sanctioned CTR's are
not UMECRA, ECTRA, or NATRC. Our rules run the ride a bit faster than Natrc,
without artificial obstacles (our trails have enough natural ones!), no
horsemanship judging. We have a great time and we like the way our rules
It's a great sport, but it isn't endurance. It's just better than NATRC, for
If you are interested go to www.ahaodistance.org
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws
Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)
- Re: [RC] the way we win/redefining endurance, A. Perez
- Re: [RC] the way we win/redefining endurance, Ed and Wendy Hauser