<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: [RC] Jerez - a few thoughts
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:35:24 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] Jerez - a few thoughts
  • - Heidi Smith
  • Prev by Date: [RC] Spice Girls Vocal (virus)??
  • - Dbeverly4

    [RC] Jerez - a few thoughts - Rides 2 Far


    > I'd love to hear what in your opinion is the safest way 
    > (metabolically for the horse) to get through the "sub-10 hour 100s"
    which seem to be  the goal .
    
    Dabney,
    Who am I to tell how to get through a sub-10 hour 100? I've never done
    one.  But I wouldn't have wanted to do a 100 with only 4 stops of 40 min.
    (Isn't that what it was?) at the speed *I* do 100's. Much less the speed
    they go.  
    
    When I've managed a 100 miler one of the big worries is how to get the
    riders through the course after dark.  The biggest reason to limit hold
    time is to help the riders get farther along *before* dark.  That doesn't
    seem to be an issue here, so I don't see a good reason to go to extremely
    short holds and long loops.  I wasn't the only one who commented *before*
    the ride. Read Steph's post from the night before. She said the loops
    were long and the holds were short. (that's from memory, but I think
    that's what she said)
    
    Even on a 50 miler, I like at least one 1-hour hold.  When you have 25
    mile loops, and things happen like, you squirt your electrolytes all out
    in your bag, or the syringe breaks, it's a long time till you get another
    chance to give them.  It seems that most 100's have 6 checks, not
    counting the pre-ride check. (At least that's always the number of
    squares on the rider card)  That has seemed to work well to me.  If
    there's a sudden hail storm like in the North American Championship in
    Arizona and temperatures plunge, management can shorten the checks if
    necessary. (so long as it's the same for all)
    
    I just don't understand not wanting the horses to have more time to eat. 
    Maybe some teams have figured out a way to keep the gut moving without
    all that time to eat naturally and it's an advantage to have fewer stops.
     I'm curious, but not curious enough to make myself think real hard to
    figure out how they're doing it.  From what I heard from the post ride
    press conference, the concensus was this is *not* a spectator sport...so
    why are we risking horses's lives trying to get spectators?
    
    Angie
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
     Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
    
     If you are an AERC member - PLEASE VOTE in the upcoming By-Laws 
     Election!!!! (it takes 2/3rds to tango!!)
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=