<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: [RC] Motion # 4
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:32:31 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] [RC] "I can't see how bareback would help. I too am short and have shortlegs and am also overweight. "
  • - kit kat
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] "I can't see how bareback would help. I too am short and have short legs and am also overweight. "
  • - Sullivan

    [RC] Motion # 4 - Randy H Eiland


    For some reason some posts I send to ridecamp don't transmit cleanly.  I hope this comes thru more clearly than before.
     
    AERC Sanctioning is much like Restaurant Franchising.  Restaurants and Endurance Rides have something in common , growth (expansion) is the lifeblood of both..  Using Pizza Hut as an example - The more Pizza Huts that are built in an area the greater the customer count and resulting economic growth...however, one of the culprits of this industry is called "cannibalism" - this occurs when a 2nd and/or 3rd Pizza Hut is built too close to another one and "cannibalizes" the customer count from the first one.  Instead of doubling or tripling customer count (income), one or both of the Pizza Huts suffers from a decreased customer count.  Instead of two very successful restaurants, you end up with one that becomes an economic drain and quite often they both suffer.  The successful restaurant chains are very careful not to locate too many units in the same market area.
     
    The same thing happens if ride dates are not coordinated.  AERC recognized decades ago that ride dates had to be coordinated...that is why we have REGIONAL SANCTIONING DIRECTORS.  AERC also realized in 1990 that the Multi Day Rides had to have one central coordinating director and the Special Events Chair was approved by the BOD in 1990 with certain guidelines to coordinate the Multi Day Rides - just as the RSD have certain guidelines to coordinate the regional rides.  The current discussion on this Motion has come up because when the BOD added 3 Day Rides to the Multi Day Category in 1996, it did not include their coordination with all other Multi Day Rides....it was an unintentional over sight.  In 1996 there were only five 3 Day Rides (and at least one was Special Sanction - Cow Tanks). 
     
    When the BOD added 3 Day Rides to the Multi Day Status, there was not a coordination problem, in fact their coordination wasn't even discussed at that meeting.  The 1996 BOD was shortsighted in not realizing there could be a problem because no one realized how popular Multi Day Rides would become.  It is important to remember that the only reason 3 Day Rides were added to the PIONEER CATEGORY was to keep the PIONEER AWARD from being voted out of existence by the BOD.  Those who were around back then will remember that we went thru two full years when the PIONEER POINTS were not printed in the Endurance News and even worse,  the points were not included in the computer system..the office had to manually calculate the points.   This was because many of the Directors from the eastern regions of AERC were opposed to the PIONEER category because it was exclusively a "western region" event - there was actually a motion in front of the BOD to eliminate the category completely and due to an error, it was never enacted.   There were no Multi Day Rides in the east because it was almost physically impossible to come up with 5 days of trails.  By adding 3 Day Rides the eastern regions at least had the opportunity to participate in the PIONEER Category and PIONEER RIDES were saved from elimination as an AERC category.
     
    Most members may not remember how severe this became, but originally the Top 10 in each division were recognized in the PIONEER Category at year end.  Their was a motion made (in 1994, I think) to only recognize the First Place Winner in each category at years end - and then someone made a motion to eliminate the award entirely...I made the motion to recognize the Top 3 and that motion was approved.  Also, the motion to add 3 Day Rides to the PIONEER AWARDS status was made by me as Chair of the Ride Managers Committee at the 1996 BOD meeting in an effort to protect the status of PIONEER RIDES as a valid interest of the membership.
     
    Also, there is not a rule that states Special Sanction Events MUST be 2 weeks apart - it is merely a guideline just like Regional Sanctioning Directors have a guideline that says Regional Rides should try to be 300 miles apart.   Also, I think Mike Maul is correct that existing rides have nothing to worry about.  All this motion does is correct an oversight from many years ago.
     
    Randy Eiland