Ridecamp: RE: [RC] EN-By Laws Vote

Go to the AERC Home page http://www.aerc.org/  or to the
http://www.aerc.org/frame_bylaws.htm.

The http://www.aerc.org/frame_bylaws.htm gives you the two
sets old and new side by side article by article comparison
with a few comments to explain the content.

Bob

Bob Morris
Morris Endurance Enterprises
Boise, ID

-----Original Message-----
From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kay
Mathews
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 2:51 PM
To: ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [RC] EN-By Laws Vote


Anybody get their EN yet?  I'm confused about the new by
laws thing.
 I've never seen endorsements for a by law change before.
Are they
re-writing all  of the thing or just changing a few items to
conform to
Calif. law. and three additions or what?  Even the
endorsements seem
"luke-warmish"-- three out of four  seem to just say - read
it and
think-- not really an endorsement .  Why do by-laws need
endorsement
statements?  What's changing?  Also, what's up with the
protest for ROC?
   My lawyer-language is  rusty (non existent), but it seems
to say
because no one wanted to answer, the protest by default gets
a "NO"?   I
hope she gets her money back.  Is this where we start
talking about
conflict of  interest? k


=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=
 Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net,
http://www.endurance.net.
 Information, Policy, Disclaimer:
http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe
http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-=-=



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
 Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe http://www.endurance.net/ridecamp/logon.asp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=