<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: RE: [RC] [RC] [RC] protecting horses
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:28:18 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] Red Cell
  • - Merryben
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] Staying After A Ride
  • - Maureen A. Fager

    RE: [RC] [RC] [RC] protecting horses - Bob Morris


    My take on this will be a bit hard to explain on line but
    here goes:
    
    I believe such a stop <<< Simplest example
    might be requiring riders to stop for 15 minutes at a
    water/hay point along
    the trail, without using a P/R gate - i.e. just arrive,
    record your time,
    and then leave 15 minutes later. >>> is more a psychological
    panacea for the riders than of beneficial aid to the horse.
    
    In the first instance the horse moving is like a pendulum.
    It gets in motion and, once moving, has a rhythm that
    utilizes minimal energy. Stop that rhythm and it requires
    additional expenditure of energy to resume the motion. Thus
    a loss.
    
    Then there is the continual arriving and leaving of other
    horses. This can cause an emotional upset that though
    slight, does call for another expenditure of energy because
    of worry.
    
    There is also the problem of the impact of stopping exercise
    for a short period of time, with the accumulation of lactic
    acid. The lessening of motion for such a short time with the
    anxiety coupled to it could prove to be upsetting.
    
    So, you have at the minimum two additional sets of energy
    loss and very minimal recovery accomplished. You would have
    better results if you slowed down and let the horse graze
    while moving.
    
    As for the concept <<< but may be considered an
    additional place along the trail for rest and recovery along
    a particularly
    hard or long loop.>>>  It could also be considered an
    opportunity to really push the horse through the hard or
    long loop thinking that the rest stop will falsely give the
    horse a chance for recovery.
    
    My concept would be to have difficult trail for as much of
    the distance as is possible and caution the riders that it
    is difficult.
    
    Bob
    
    Bob Morris
    Morris Endurance Enterprises
    Boise, ID
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Steph Teeter [mailto:steph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
    Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 8:32 AM
    To: ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; bobmorris@xxxxxxxx
    Subject: RE: [RC] [RC] [RC] protecting horses
    
    
    The rules reference a 'veterinary control point'. I was
    interpreting the
    original question as a 'non-veterinary control point'.
    Simplest example
    might be requiring riders to stop for 15 minutes at a
    water/hay point along
    the trail, without using a P/R gate - i.e. just arrive,
    record your time,
    and then leave 15 minutes later. You could also have a P/R
    gate into a hold,
    but still not require the riders to do anything other than
    wait for 15
    minutes. No veterinary attendance.
    
    This isn't necessarily a substitue for a vet-check, but may
    be considered an
    additional place along the trail for rest and recovery along
    a particularly
    hard or long loop.
    
    Bob?
    
    Steph
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    [mailto:ridecamp-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Nancy
    Mitts
    Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 8:00 AM
    To: lindap@xxxxxxx; ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: Re: [RC] [RC] [RC] protecting horses
    
    
    Thanks Linda,
    I know that's been the take on the rule up here too. Is
    Central Region the
    only one looking at it that way?
    
    Nancy
    
    >From: "Linda Parrish" <lindap@xxxxxxx>
    >To: "Ridecamp" <ridecamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    >Subject: Re: [RC]   [RC] protecting horses
    >Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 22:38:00 -0500
    >
    >Nancy,
    >
    >There was a situation at a ride three or four years back
    where a ride
    >manager held a check without a vet present. It was just a
    stop-n-go (meet
    >pulse criteria and continue on). Vonita (and TERA) agreed
    that this was in
    >violation of the AERC rules. The TERA rides always have a
    vet on hand at
    >any
    >control point on the rides.
    >
    >Linda Parrish
    >Kennard, TX
    >
    
    
    ____________________________________________________________
    _____
    Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device:
    http://mobile.msn.com
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    =-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net,
    http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer:
    http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    =-=-=-=-=
    
    
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    
    

    Replies
    RE: [RC] [RC] [RC] protecting horses, Steph Teeter