<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Refusing entry to rides [was How Sad]
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:28:19 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: Re: [RC] Less controversial topic? Human hydration!
  • - Linda Flemmer
  • Prev by Date: RE: [RC] Protecting Horses / vet checks
  • - Bob Morris

    Re: [RC] Refusing entry to rides [was How Sad] - Truman Prevatt


    I don't see how entry could be denied for a treatment the prior year unless treatment could be tied to documented abusive treatment. Second is this what we really want to do? If a rider chose to not treat a marginal horse ( that could benefit from treatment ) because he would not be able to enter the next year this would be an unintended consequence and not a good one IMO.

    Truman

    Lif Strand wrote:

    John - I don't see anything in the AERC rules which would apply to not allowing an entry to someone who had to treat a horse after a ride was over in a prior year.

    Just how much leeway does a RM have?

    Lif Strand
    Quemado NM  USA





    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
    Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


    Replies
    Re: [RC] How Sad, Lif Strand
    Re: [RC] How Sad, Lynne Glazer
    Re: [RC] How Sad, Trailrite
    [RC] Refusing entry to rides [was How Sad], Lif Strand