Ridecamp: Re: [RC] Refusing entry to rides [was How Sad]

I don't see how entry could be denied for a treatment the prior year 
unless treatment could be tied to documented abusive treatment. Second 
is this what we really want to do? If a rider chose to not treat a 
marginal horse ( that could benefit from treatment ) because he would 
not be able to enter the next year this would be an unintended 
consequence and not a good one IMO.

Truman

Lif Strand wrote:

> John - I don't see anything in the AERC rules which would apply to not 
> allowing an entry to someone who had to treat a horse after a ride was 
> over in a prior year.
>
> Just how much leeway does a RM have?
>
> Lif Strand
> Quemado NM  USA




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=