<% appTitle="Ridecamp Archives" %> Ridecamp: [RC] "The good old days or NOT!!!!
Ridecamp@Endurance.Net

[Archives Index]   [Date Index]   [Thread Index]   [Author Index]   [Subject Index]
Current to Wed Jul 23 17:26:56 GMT 2003
  • Next by Date: [RC] Fw: [PNER] Mt. Adams
  • - Stephanie Irving
  • Prev by Date: Re: [RC] Critical Thinking/The six rules of evidential reasoning /was pet communicators
  • - Ridecamp Guest

    [RC] "The good old days or NOT!!!! - Kathy's eMail


    Well I would just like to TOTALLY agree with Susan--You GO Girl!!!!!!!!
    Team Slow Poke,
    Kathy
    
    arlinghouse" <suendavid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Subject: [RC]   musings re "the good old days"
    
    
    All of this is JMO, so everybody feel free to hit delete now.  I keep
    hearing comments here and there about how in the old days, horses turned in
    wonderful performances with nothing more than a handful of hay, no
    electrolytes, etc etc.  The way you hear it from some folks (and I'm not
    picking on anyone specific whatsoever), the horses of old all danced their
    ways down the trail without hardly breaking a sweat, everybody always
    finished, everything was ducky.  So the conclusion there to be made is why
    do we need all this new research, all these electrolyte formulations, all
    these new things when everyone did so well in the old days?
    
    Maybe I'm just playing devil's advocate here, but I'm not so sure things
    were so wonderful from the horse's perspective.  I've talked to vets that
    talk about lame or thumping horses being allowed to go on that these days
    would be pulled in a heartbeat (and saw the same thing for myself).  You
    sure didn't hear about commonplace nine hour 100s and sub four-hour 50s
    (though maybe there were...Bob?) back then.  I suspect there weren't as many
    rides available and except for the trailer race crowd, horses got more
    off-time between rides instead of riding back to back top ten rides week
    after week.  I know of more than one horse that won a big, hard 100-mile
    ride back then without anything more than a little hay and water, was
    supposedly "retired" but in reality had so little kidney function left he
    couldn't handle anything more than standing in a pasture looking exhausted
    for the rest of his life.  I think it was alot more commonplace then anyone
    let on, and I think that's *still* more commonplace than we're admitting.
    
    I also think the endurance crowd is different than it was a ways back.  I
    didn't start hanging around until the late 80's, but even I've noticed a LOT
    more relatively inexperienced owners and riders showing up---no flames on
    any of them, but alot of people are showing up that possibly don't
    understand the value of LSD, that peeing coffee doesn't just mean he needs a
    drink and that it's not normal for a horse to do that funny hiccuping thing.
    
     I'm not saying that across the board, endurance riders were better horseman
    20 years ago---but alot of them were.  And a better horseman can "get away"
    with a lot more than a novice rider might.  Maybe the novice rider needs the
    extra benefits of better el'yte formulations, better feeds, better saddles.
    Maybe just to do better themselves, but more importantly, maybe to help the
    horse avoid injury better.
    
    And I guess my other thought (which is still JMO) is that yeah, most horses
    could probably survive endurance just fine without anything more than hay
    and water during a hot, hard ride.  But are they doing BETTER than if they
    aren't given better feeds, better tack, better elyte formulas?  I don't
    think so, not in most cases if the innovations are used right (there are
    always exceptions).  Alot of riders back then also rode in blue jeans and
    "survived" just fine, but boy, I'm sure happy there's such a thing as lycra
    tights these days.  Am I gonna ride in blue jeans today because that's how
    they used to ride and gee, they seemed to do okay?  Not freakin' likely.
    
    And if that's the case, then what possible excuse could anyone have for not
    making the extra effort to use new knowledge and provide the very best of
    care to any endurance horse before, during or after a ride?  How dare any
    rider not do or at least consider using every available tool just because,
    "well, this stuff wasn't around thirty years ago and they still finished
    rides..."  Horses died or were injured back then because of things that
    weren't known, and horses will continue to die or be injured today if their
    riders don't learn everything they can about their horse and what the new
    information is telling us.
    
    To do otherwise is irresponsible to the horse, and they deserve much better.
    
    JMO.
    
    Susan G
    
    
    
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
     Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
     Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/Ridecamp
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=