I assumed that would be a given, especially when 
  I said that "happy hour"  or rider option, and accident pulls didn't 
  count. If we have too many happy hour pulls, then how would the world perceive 
  our sport? As one hellava good time, that's how!
   
  Another good point someone brought up was how 
  hold times effect how long it takes to finish a ride. Maybe that is something 
  AERC should look into. If you have 12 hours to do a ride, but 3/12 hours hold 
  time, that could make people go much faster than they are ready to just to 
  complete. 
   
  Did anybody read what Cindy Collins said about 
  Hall of Fame inductee Kathy Arnold? She said "What makes her a champion is 
  hard work and horsemanship. It is also determination and consistency. And it's never going to a ride without a 
  horse in top condition for the pace she's going to set and never riding faster 
  than the pace she planned.". 
  Yea, That's what I'm talking about. 
   
  Lisa Salas, the Odd Farm
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  
    
    
    Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 11:14 
    AM
    Subject: Re: [RC] something for 
    money
    
    Do you honestly think that if a completion rate is low it is 
      because the ride was tough? 
Perhaps we should not use 
    completion rate as a guage.  Many times it is "rider option" as Angie 
    said, she pulled at Biltmore so did a lot of other riders. A better guage, 
    if you must use one,  would be equine pulls- metabolic or otherwise. 
    
Just trying to clarify, 
Jackie Baker