Re: RE: Re: The Winning Debate

["Sandy Bolinger" <bolinger@bigsky.net>]

and exactly where is the substantive value in either of these posts???

----- Original Message -----
From: <Tivers@aol.com>
To: <CMKSAGEHIL@aol.com>; <msofen@pacbell.net>; <ridecamp@endurance.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 10:21 PM
Subject: RC: RE: Re: The Winning Debate


> In a message dated 9/5/00 9:03:50 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> CMKSAGEHIL@aol.com writes:
>
> << <  Cheap potshots of no
>   substance whatsoever debase the Ridecamp coin of the realm. Which is,
the
>   development of information.   >>
>
>  THUD!!  TI said that?????  Remember that, everybody, when he starts
slinging
>  around his vitriolic potshots...
>
>  Heidi >>
>
>
> I always respond in kind. I suppose you believe the post above is
substantive
> and polite. You take a lot of hits, and keep coming back for more, though.
> Got to give you credit in that regard. A glutton for punishment. Notice,
> though, that I always give you the last idiotic word--always stop short of
> causing a nervous breakdown. That makes you a WINNER every time!  Show a
> little gratitude.
>
> ti
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Ridecamp is a service of Endurance Net, http://www.endurance.net.
> Information, Policy, Disclaimer: http://www.endurance.net/RideCamp
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>