Re: Re: The Winning Debate

["Susan Garlinghouse" <suendavid@worldnet.att.net>]

> << In battle, if you can cause the opponent to abort thought for emotional
>  impulse, you win. Works every time, here.
>   >>
> too bad - you are just a 'warrior'. For  awhile I thought perhaps you had
> something, somewhere, sometime, of value to say. Guess not. How sick is
that?

Well, let's put it into more medical terms---if you inflame an area a bit
while injecting a vaccine simultaneously, you get a better, increased, and
more long-lasting beneficial effect than if you just injected the vaccine
without the irritating adjuvant.

I say Tom is just applying his own brand of Field Immunology <g>.  I *think*
more following an exchange with Tom than I do with anyone else here (except
possibly Sarah).

C'mon, I've traded equal potshots with Tom at his worst (or best) and I'm
still standing and ready for more anytime schedule permits.  If I can take
it, so can everyone else.

Susan G